Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Na Li vs Shahar Peer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Li vs Peer analysis and find out who is favored!
Na Li vs Shahar Peer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Li 2 - 2 Peer
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Li has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Peer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Li, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Peer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Li has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Peer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Li has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Peer winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Li has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 73% (W/L 260/ 96), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 29/ 18). Peer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 247/ 165), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 18/ 23).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Li winning 2 times and Peer being victorious 2 times. They have played 10 sets in total, with Li winning 5 and Peer winning 5. The last match between Li and Peer was at the Mutua Madrilena Madrid Open - Madrid, 14-05-2010, Quarterfinals, Clay with Shahar Peer getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Li and Peer have played a deciding set 2 times, with Li winning 1 times and Peer 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Li winning 0, and Peer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Li has played against opponents with an average rank of while Peer has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Li has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Peer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Li has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Peer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
2
High
42
Age
R
Plays
2
Total2
2
Hard1
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
11
High
37
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
70% (402-169)
Career Total W/L
58% (388-277)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$12,713,039
Career Prize Money
$2,894,734
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Na Li vs Shahar Peer For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Li VS Peer
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Na Li | Shahar Peer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 5 | 5 |
| Games Won | 45 | 36 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 3 |
| DFs Total | 12 | 15 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (226/326) | 70% (199/286) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 59% (134/226) | 57% (113/199) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (48/100) | 41% (36/87) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (17/34) | 28% (13/46) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (137/286) | 44% (144/326) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (2/4) | 50% (2/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (3/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 3-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Shahar Peer
Player
Na Li
72%
(
81 of
112)
1st Serve %
69%
(
85 of
124)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
45 of
85)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
47%
(
53 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
59 of
124)
118
Total Points Won
118
|
||||
| 7-5 3-0 ret. |
Stats
Shahar Peer
Player
Na Li
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
74%
(
43 of
58)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| 2-6 6-0 6-1 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Shahar Peer
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Shahar Peer
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Na Li | Shahar Peer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Na Li Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Barbora Strycova
Player
Na Li
69%
(
70 of
102)
1st Serve %
62%
(
52 of
84)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
39 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
30 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Yvonne Meusburger
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Paula Kania
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
77%
(
50 of
65)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristina Mladenovic
Player
Na Li
51%
(
43 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sara Errani
Player
Na Li
79%
(
68 of
86)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
45%
(
39 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
92
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Samantha Stosur
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Casey Dellacqua
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve %
74%
(
37 of
50)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Sharapova
Player
Na Li
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Sloane Stephens
71%
(
66 of
93)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Jie Zheng
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
75%
(
30 of
40)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Shahar Peer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktorija Golubic
Player
Shahar Peer
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paula Cristina Goncalves
Player
Shahar Peer
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
48%
(
29 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Kateryna Volodko
Player
Shahar Peer
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Shahar Peer
Player
Tena Lukas
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
91)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Shahar Peer
Player
Valeria Gorlats
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
33%
(
19 of
58)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Ipek Soylu
Player
Shahar Peer
57%
(
58 of
102)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
1
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
4
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
45 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
44 of
88)
101
Total Points Won
89
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kristyna Pliskova
Player
Shahar Peer
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
12
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
3
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
31 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jana Cepelova
Player
Shahar Peer
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronica Cepede Royg
Player
Shahar Peer
74%
(
62 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
10
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Glushko
Player
Shahar Peer
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Li Vs Peer Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Li are available here and Peer photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
