Prediction of Na Li vs Shahar Peer Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
N. Li vs S. Peer

Na Li

CHN

2

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

1.72m

Height

1.70m

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$12.7M

Career Money

$2.9M

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Shahar Peer

ISR

2

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

1.72m

Height

1.70m

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$12.7M

Career Money

$2.9M

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Head-to-head: Li 2 - 2 Peer

They have played 10 sets in total, with Na Li winning 5 and Shahar Peer winning 5. The last match between Shahar Peer and Na Li was at the Mutua Madrilena Madrid Open - Madrid, 14-05-2010, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Shahar Peer getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Li	2
Peer	2

Last 4 H2H Matches:

(QF) Mutua Madrilena Madrid Open - Madrid(05-14-10)

Stats

Shahar Peer

Na Li

(QF) Barclays Dubai Tennis Championships - Dubai(02-18-10)

Stats

Shahar Peer

Na Li

(R1) U.S. Open - New York(08-25-08)

Stats

Na Li

Shahar Peer

N. Li vs S. Peer H2H Profile

N. Li	Stats	S. Peer
$12,713,039	Career Prize Money	$2,894,734
70.40% (402-169)	Career Total W/L	58.08% (388-280)
0	Clay	1
2	Hard	1
15	Titles	9
2	Total H2H Matches	2
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

N. Li vs S. Peer Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Na Li has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Shahar Peer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Na Li, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Shahar Peer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Na Li has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Shahar Peer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Na Li has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Shahar Peer winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Na Li has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 73% (W/L 260/96), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 29/18). Shahar Peer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 73% (W/L 247/165), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 18/23).
Player level: In the last year, Na Li has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Shahar Peer has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Na Li winning 2 times and Shahar Peer being victorious 2 times. They have played 10 sets in total, with Na Li winning 5 and Shahar Peer winning 5.
The last match between Na Li and Shahar Peer was at the Mutua Madrilena Madrid Open - Madrid, 14-05-2010, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Shahar Peer getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Deciding set H2H prediction: Na Li and Shahar Peer have played a deciding set 2 times, with Na Li winning 1 times and Shahar Peer 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Na Li has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Shahar Peer has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Na Li has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Shahar Peer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Na Li has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Shahar Peer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Na Li vs Shahar Peer Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Li vs S. Peer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

N. Li	Stats	S. Peer
2	H2H Matches Won	2
5	Sets Won	5
45	Games Won	36
6	Aces (Total)	3
12	Total Double Faults	15
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
69% (226/326)	1st Serve %	70% (199/286)
59% (134/226)	1st Serve Win %	57% (113/199)
48% (48/100)	2nd Serve Win %	41% (36/87)
50% (17/34)	Break Pts Won %	28% (13/46)
48% (137/286)	Return Points Win %	44% (144/326)
50% (2/4)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (2/4)
50% (1/2)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (1/2)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	67% (2/3)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	33% (1/3)
33% (1/3)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

N. Li Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Wimbledon - London - 23-06-2014
R3 Barbora StrycovaB. Strycova	L	7-6(5) 7-6(5)	Stats
R2 Yvonne MeusburgerY. Meusburger	W	6-2 6-2	Stats
R1 Paula KaniaP. Kania	W	7-5 6-2	Stats
French Open - Paris - 26-05-2014
R1 Kristina MladenovicK. Mladenovic	L	7-5 3-6 6-1	Stats
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome - 12-05-2014
QF Sara ErraniS. Errani	L	6-3 4-6 6-2	Stats

View All

S. Peer Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Abierto Monterrey Afirme - Monterrey - 29-02-2016
Q1 Viktorija GolubicV. Golubic	L	6-4 7-5	Stats
Rio Open - Rio de Janeiro - 15-02-2016
Q1 Paula Cristina GoncalvesP. Cristina	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
Fed Cup, Europe/Africa Zone Group I - 01-02-2016
Rubber 1 Kateryna VolodkoK. Volodko	L	6-1 6-1	Stats
Rubber 1 Tena LukasT. Lukas	W	3-6 6-1 6-2	Stats
Rubber 1 Valeria GorlatsV. Gorlats	W	6-0 6-3	Stats

View All

N. Li vs S. Peer Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

N. Li	Stats	S. Peer
70.40% (402/169)	YTD Win/Loss	58.35% (388/277)
66.77% (872/434)	Sets Win/Loss	56.14% (855/668)
57.04% (6813/5132)	Games Win/Loss	52.37% (7235/6580)
73.03% (260/96)	Hard Win/Loss	59.95% (247/165)
69.09% (76/34)	Clay Win/Loss	57.53% (84/62)
60.00% (30/20)	Indoor Hard W/L	59.09% (39/27)
65.45% (36/19)	Grass Win/Loss	43.90% (18/23)
0.15	Aces Per Game	0.08
871	Aces Total	551
0.23	Double Faults Per Game	0.23
1314	Total Double Faults	1575
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
477.34	Average Opponent Rank	515.01
67% (19612/29098)	1st Serve %	65% (21212/32646)
64% (12471/19612)	1st Serve Win %	61% (12882/21212)
49% (4610/9482)	2nd Serve Win %	44% (5081/11441)
49% (1849/3779)	Break Points Won % (Total)	48% (2024/4236)
47% (13660/29265)	Return Points Win %	46% (15135/32818)
72.80% (91/34)	Slam W/L	57.14% (60/45)
65.90% (114/59)	Masters W/L	54.84% (85/70)
83.33% (10/2)	Cups W/L	61.76% (21/13)
68.06% (147/69)	Main Tour W/L	59.43% (189/129)
88.89% (40/5)	Challenger W/L	62.26% (33/20)
71% (400/564)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	58% (384/659)
0% (0/0)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	100% (2/2)
55% (68/123)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	57% (71/125)
60% (103/173)	Deciding Set Win %	58% (114/195)
91% (387/351)	1st Set Won, Won Match	87% (370/321)
9% (387/35)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (370/49)
28% (182/51)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	23% (295/67)